<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil&#8217;s Marketing Strategy &#8211; Not So Cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/</link>
	<description>Mobile Marketing, Facebook Marketing, Twitter Marketing, SEO and PPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-319</guid>
		<description>I tried Cuil and was very disappointed. I mean, what kind of a search engine can&#039;t even return itself as a result?

Pauls last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/xatal/~3/356098544/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tips on receiving a quality letter of recommendation&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Cuil and was very disappointed. I mean, what kind of a search engine can&#8217;t even return itself as a result?</p>
<p>Pauls last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/xatal/~3/356098544/" rel="nofollow">Tips on receiving a quality letter of recommendation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversem</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried Cuil but  it doesn&#039;t even come close to Google&#039;s quality. I was disappointed because after al the things they said about Cuil I really thought it was better. 

But okay, Google is a damn complex engine, you just can&#039;t build a better one overnight. That&#039;s just not feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried Cuil but  it doesn&#8217;t even come close to Google&#8217;s quality. I was disappointed because after al the things they said about Cuil I really thought it was better. </p>
<p>But okay, Google is a damn complex engine, you just can&#8217;t build a better one overnight. That&#8217;s just not feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-310</guid>
		<description>in fact*, not in face :)...

Sorry, early!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in fact*, not in face <img src='http://marketinghackz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry, early!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-309</guid>
		<description>@ Ritu:

I&#039;m not disagreeing with your post, but none of this would be an issue if their service DID live up to expectation. In face, I would be bold enough to say that their marketing tactics would be praised in its efficiency. I know expectations were not met by many consumers, but if they were, I don&#039;t think individuals would be criticizing a very cost-affordable and underestimated marketing attempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ritu:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not disagreeing with your post, but none of this would be an issue if their service DID live up to expectation. In face, I would be bold enough to say that their marketing tactics would be praised in its efficiency. I know expectations were not met by many consumers, but if they were, I don&#8217;t think individuals would be criticizing a very cost-affordable and underestimated marketing attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ritu</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-307</guid>
		<description>@ Tom : I still think it was a wrong approach to marketing. Yes, they did get their name out there but what&#039;s the point of marketing a service to so extreme that it doesn&#039;t live upto expectation? Also I see the point that they are in beta, this is why I suggested they should have launched a private beta first and got some feedback, before heading out as Google&#039;s competitor.

The saying &quot; First impression is also the last impression &quot; might come true in this case. If you have been following the blogosphere, you probably know about Blogrush. They created such a hype and the fact that John Reese was the founder created so much expectation but they failed to live upto that. Where is Blogrush now? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tom : I still think it was a wrong approach to marketing. Yes, they did get their name out there but what&#8217;s the point of marketing a service to so extreme that it doesn&#8217;t live upto expectation? Also I see the point that they are in beta, this is why I suggested they should have launched a private beta first and got some feedback, before heading out as Google&#8217;s competitor.</p>
<p>The saying &#8221; First impression is also the last impression &#8221; might come true in this case. If you have been following the blogosphere, you probably know about Blogrush. They created such a hype and the fact that John Reese was the founder created so much expectation but they failed to live upto that. Where is Blogrush now? <img src='http://marketinghackz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but I couldn&#039;t disagree with this post more. Sure, Cuil didn&#039;t live up to certain individuals expectations, and I DO agree that &#039;Positive results come from positive user experience&#039;, but think about how much money they saved on Marketing. Their viral approach may have not been a feasible solution for you, but economically, for them, was ideal. Pertaining to their services, sure, it could of been slightly better, but as for marketing to their demographic(s), it was a complete success and did stirr up a lot of buzz. I feel that &quot;word of mouth&quot; marketing is underestimated and the exponential potential can be groundbreaking for new startups, especially online. I understand that due to their service being &quot;less than all the hype expected&quot;, that they are open to criticism. Honestly though, they&#039;re in Beta, they WILL make changes, and as much as you say they ruined their opportunity, their name is now &quot;out there&quot;. People will be interested when Cuil makes their next move. 

Rebuttal? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I couldn&#8217;t disagree with this post more. Sure, Cuil didn&#8217;t live up to certain individuals expectations, and I DO agree that &#8216;Positive results come from positive user experience&#8217;, but think about how much money they saved on Marketing. Their viral approach may have not been a feasible solution for you, but economically, for them, was ideal. Pertaining to their services, sure, it could of been slightly better, but as for marketing to their demographic(s), it was a complete success and did stirr up a lot of buzz. I feel that &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; marketing is underestimated and the exponential potential can be groundbreaking for new startups, especially online. I understand that due to their service being &#8220;less than all the hype expected&#8221;, that they are open to criticism. Honestly though, they&#8217;re in Beta, they WILL make changes, and as much as you say they ruined their opportunity, their name is now &#8220;out there&#8221;. People will be interested when Cuil makes their next move. </p>
<p>Rebuttal? <img src='http://marketinghackz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Downer</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Downer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Amen! Not only was cuil.com&#039;s launch utterly disappoint and completely overhyped; I found that due to server overload I couldn&#039;t perform searches for the first few days. Additionally, and as you correctly pointed out, many of the searches I performed didn&#039;t even come close to giving accurate results.

The other issue that I would like to take, and probably a bit off-topic for this marketing blog, is with Cuil&#039;s design. The 2 and three column search result page design not only makes it difficult to find what you&#039;re looking for, it flies in the face of tried and true methods.

It&#039;s great to try and be something different. But carefully weigh whether or not your users are so familiar with a competitors product or service that they simply will not &quot;get&quot; your approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen! Not only was cuil.com&#8217;s launch utterly disappoint and completely overhyped; I found that due to server overload I couldn&#8217;t perform searches for the first few days. Additionally, and as you correctly pointed out, many of the searches I performed didn&#8217;t even come close to giving accurate results.</p>
<p>The other issue that I would like to take, and probably a bit off-topic for this marketing blog, is with Cuil&#8217;s design. The 2 and three column search result page design not only makes it difficult to find what you&#8217;re looking for, it flies in the face of tried and true methods.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to try and be something different. But carefully weigh whether or not your users are so familiar with a competitors product or service that they simply will not &#8220;get&#8221; your approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Cuil certainly managed to get a lot of attention quickly, but I&#039;ve never been one to agree that all press is good press.  You&#039;re not going to accomplish much by being notoriously useless.

Colins last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What’s the deal with Cuil?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil certainly managed to get a lot of attention quickly, but I&#8217;ve never been one to agree that all press is good press.  You&#8217;re not going to accomplish much by being notoriously useless.</p>
<p>Colins last blog post..<a href="http://workwebplay.com/2008/07/29/whats-the-deal-with-cuil/" rel="nofollow">What’s the deal with Cuil?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://marketinghackz.com/cuils-marketing-strategy-not-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketinghackz.com/?p=273#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I tried Cuil and searched for my blog (20smoney.com) and couldn&#039;t even find it!

Imagine that!  My internationally recognized brand of 20smoney wasn&#039;t found!  (I&#039;m kidding).

Great post on hype marketing though.  I totally agree with your message.

Kevins last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://20smoney.com/2008/07/31/is-investing-in-battered-down-iconic-brands-a-good-investment-strategy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is Investing In Battered-Down Iconic Brands A Good Investment Strategy?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Cuil and searched for my blog (20smoney.com) and couldn&#8217;t even find it!</p>
<p>Imagine that!  My internationally recognized brand of 20smoney wasn&#8217;t found!  (I&#8217;m kidding).</p>
<p>Great post on hype marketing though.  I totally agree with your message.</p>
<p>Kevins last blog post..<a href="http://20smoney.com/2008/07/31/is-investing-in-battered-down-iconic-brands-a-good-investment-strategy/" rel="nofollow">Is Investing In Battered-Down Iconic Brands A Good Investment Strategy?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 17/38 queries in 0.044 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: marketinghackz.com @ 2012-02-09 21:51:06 -->
