Sorry for the title if it comes across rude or problematic in anyway but at this point I really care less. You know what they say – you can hold the water behind a dam for only so long and when it breaks, the water is going to come out full force wrecking everything on its path. Well, I certainly don’t have the power or the force but I do have some words that StumbleUpon admins need to hear and apply to their bullshit model and copycat attitude.

I have included the letter in this article that I sent to StumbleUpon using their contact form. I know I have wasted my time writing the letter cause as usual its probably dumped into their trash and marked as “Another banned user, LOL.”

Anyway, this is why I am so outraged. Well, first things first my StumbleUpon account has been under review for over a week. I am not pissed off at that because I might have done something that might be against their TOS, I wouldn’t know cause I haven’t heard from them. Did I promote my own sites on StumbleUpon? You bet I did, don’t you? Of course you do.

I have never used StumbleUpon to solely promote my sites. I spend a good two hours each day stumbling naturally using their toolbar and reviewing contents and participating. I am an active member within the community. I like their service. I use it to bookmark sites, images, articles that I like and at times there might be a few articles that I might “thumb up” or “discover” from the same site, not cause I am promoting it because I would like it to be seen by my friends on StumbleUpon who follow me and for bookmarking purpose. StumbleUpon team doesn’t seem to understand that I guess. Anyway, my anger isn’t about me getting banned. its about not getting a response after sending countless emails. I have talked to a few other users who are banned as well and they are going through the same ordeal. No reply what so ever.

StumbleUpon team, it can’t be that hard to lift up a finger and sent a reply and tell me “Hey, you are banned for doing so and so and you are banned permanently.” It’s your freaking site, it’s your genius idea (its damn good) but you do have a certain liability towards your userbase and replying to issues and concerns they might have should be a priority. You have failed and you can keep my account. Pimp it, junk it, kill it….it’s yours to keep. You have a great service but you have failed to keep your users happy. And like any other users I am not going to create another account. If you don’t have enough respect for me as a user who appreciates your site and service you sure as hell do not deserve the time out of my day. Have a good one and kiss my ass!

Here is what I wrote to StumbleUpon team,

Hi!

I haven’t been able to use my account for more than a week. I am not sure what triggered you to keep me from using my account and putting it “under review.” I am sure there is a reason behind your actions and a good one at that. but don’t you think it would be helpful if I got a response so I know what exactly is going on? It is my account and I use your service to bookmark and browse fun sites and contents. If I have wasted a year of my time trying to build a profile and maintain a good standing within a community, I think I have a right to know why I am not allowed to use the service anymore. I am not even sure if I am banned temporarily or permanently. An answer is much appreciated and I think running a service that is as popular as StumbleUpon, the admins should realize that they have a responsibility towards their users. Keeping me in dark doesn’t help and doesn’t really create a very good impression of you either. Whether or not you decide to reinstate my account is out of question at this moment. The question is – do you realize you are responsible to get back to your usersbase when there is an ongoing issue?

Would appreciate an answer regarding my account. If I don’t get a response (which I doubt I will) I guess a service that I have considered an integral part of my online life was nothing but a failed model and a copycat.

Sincerely,
Ritu


Incoming search terms for this article: